KTMU Hosts Scholarly Discussions on Eurasia's Shared History


  • 2026-03-25

The “Eurasian Symposium on History, Language, and Cultural Studies,” jointly organized by the Republic of Türkiye’s Atatürk Supreme Council for Culture, Language and History, the Turkish Historical Society, Kyrgyz-Turkish Manas University, and Ankara University, which began the previous day, has concluded with interdisciplinary discussions and new academic collaborations.

During the two-day scientific sessions, the historical depth, linguistic layers, and cultural continuity of the Eurasian geography were addressed from a broad perspective, ranging from written sources to archaeological data, from migration history to digital heritage studies. The symposium provided an intellectual platform where new questions, methodologies, and academic engagements concerning the future of research on the Turkic world were generated.

Held at the Kasym Tynystanov Conference Hall of KTMU, the symposium brought together fields such as history, linguistics, cultural studies, archaeology, ancient studies, cultural heritage, and digital humanities on a shared academic ground following the opening remarks and a special session. Presentations not only focused on producing knowledge about the past but also addressed how Eurasian knowledge can be preserved, interpreted, and transmitted to future generations. In this regard, the symposium moved beyond conventional historical narratives, opening Turkic world studies to renewed discussion around source criticism, cultural continuity, interdisciplinary methodologies, and digitalization.

Sessions on the first day highlighted a compelling scholarly framework through the combined evaluation of written sources and archaeological materials in Turkic world history. Presentations on Göktürk inscriptions, anthropomorphic stone statues, Hun-Turkic elements, Greek and Latin historical sources, rock art, and Scythian artifacts demonstrated that Eurasian history extends beyond a linear narrative, constituting a field of multi-sourced and multi-layered analysis.

A key common point in these sessions was addressing Eurasia’s past not only through “what happened,” but also through “with what evidence, interpretative frameworks, and interdisciplinary tools it is reconstructed.” This approach stood out as one of the main elements strengthening the scientific quality of the symposium.

The second main topic of the program focused on the future and digitalization of the cultural heritage of the Turkic world. Presentations ranging from the philosophical foundations of culture and identity to traditional games, dairy culture, calendar systems, folk beliefs, musical heritage, and Nowruz revealed that cultural heritage is a living and evolving domain of social memory.

Discussions on cultural continuity, ritual practices, and the preservation of both written and unwritten heritage added a significant depth that distinguished the symposium from conventional history conferences. Accordingly, a strong academic framework was developed on how cultural heritage can be preserved through contemporary methods and circulated in the digital age.

Sessions on the second day focused on migration movements, political structures, linguistic interactions, and civilizational relations. Topics such as migration routes from antiquity to the present, Seljuk rule, the relationship between Kyrgyz history and epic traditions, diplomatic relations, animal symbolism in steppe societies, and historical geography reaffirmed Eurasia as a space of movement, interaction, and cultural exchange.

Similarly, sessions dedicated to Turkic language studies emphasized that fields such as Turkology, Hungarology, 19th-century Kyrgyz written culture, historical interaction between Turkish and Urdu, and the use of geographic information systems in historical and archaeological research demonstrate that linguistic studies now extend beyond philology into spatial, cultural, and digital dimensions.

One of the symposium’s strongest aspects was the diversity of its papers in both subject matter and methodology. The convergence of approaches such as archaeological analysis, historical document examination, cultural analysis, comparative history, spatial analysis, and digital reconstruction within the same academic framework demonstrated that Eurasian studies are increasingly evolving into an integrated field of research.

In his closing remarks, KTMU Rector Prof. Dr. Alpaslan Ceylan emphasized that bringing together scholars from various universities and research circles in Türkiye at Manas University carries strong significance for academic relations within the Turkic world. He stated that the symposium constitutes a scientific platform that will strengthen academic production related to the Turkic world at the international level.

Rector Prof. Dr. Ceylan also highlighted Manas University’s goal of becoming an open academic center for graduate and doctoral researchers, stressing the need for Turkic world-oriented studies to advance through more institutionalized and sustainable networks.

Chair of the Organizing Committee and Dean of the Faculty of Humanities Prof. Dr. Alpaslan Aşık noted in his closing evaluation that such interdisciplinary scientific gatherings not only facilitate the exchange of knowledge but also enable the emergence of new research questions, collaborations, and shared academic directions. He further emphasized that the symposium provided a scientific basis not only for studying the history, language, and culture of Eurasia but also for understanding, interpreting, and transmitting shared memory.

In the overall evaluation session, it was underlined that Kyrgyz-Turkish Manas University functions not merely as a symbolic but as an institutional and productive academic bridge between Kyrgyzstan and Türkiye. In this respect, the symposium evolved beyond a conventional gathering into a scientific platform positioning Manas University as a vibrant center for Eurasian studies.

As part of the symposium’s social program, a historical and cultural excursion scheduled for March 26 will include visits to the Ata-Beyit Memorial Complex, the ruins of Burana (Balasagun), and the National Museum, enabling participants to experience firsthand the relationship between space, memory, and cultural heritage.

    Share on social media: